linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] hwmon: Add support for W83667HG-B

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 Jul 2010 16:59:03 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
Cc:	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
	H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ethan Lawrence <e.law87@...oo.com>,
	"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"lars4910@...mail.com" <lars4910@...mail.com>,
	"birdie@...monline.ru" <birdie@...monline.ru>,
	"jadcock@....net" <jadcock@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] hwmon: Add support for W83667HG-B

On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 07:09:44 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 05:51:23AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:31:44 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:13:45AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:07:04 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > I'll also add a check for the HG-I.
> > > > 
> > > > Do you have a datasheet for that one too?
> > > > 
> > > No. However, since we have a tester, we will have test coverage,
> > > so I figured it should be worth a try. If it doesn't work
> > > I can still drop it from the final patch.
> > 
> > FYI, I have a datasheet, which unfortunately I am not allowed to share.
> > Please let me know if you want me to look up something for you.
> > 
> How about the changed registers ? Would give us an idea if the chip is closer to 
> 667 or to 667-B.

There is no summary of this available. The only way is to go through
both datasheets and compare all registers in sequence. This takes time,
which is exactly why I couldn't find the time to do it :(

> > > I suspect it is the same as the HG with a different chip ID.
> > 
> > Beware, it's a different device number (677 vs. 667) so I would expect
> > more differences.
>
> Ah, I missed that. I thought it was 667-I. Yes, you are right, that suggests
> more differences.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/