lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 03:52:48 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> Cc: James.Bottomley@...e.de, axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] use q->prep_rq_fn for flush requests instead of q->prepare_flush_fn() On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:33:23PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > We could kill q->prepare_flush_fn(). Except for ide, all the users > just mark flush requests. They can use REQ_FLUSH flag instead. Ide can > do like SCSI. Yes, and I think you should go all the way to kill it instead of keeping both APIs around. Otherwise the patchset looks good to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists