linux-kernel - Re: [rfc] new stat*fs-like syscall?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Jul 2010 21:44:37 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Brad Boyer <flar@...andria.com>,
	"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] new stat*fs-like syscall?

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 09:45:26AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Let's not overdesign things. Just do something like the attached
> patch, which is the obvious and straightforward thing to do.
> 
> Overdesigning is a disease. It's fundamentally wrong.
> 
> (Yeah, yeah,. the patch is untested, and doesn't actually _fill_ the
> new f_flags value, but that's left as a trivial exercise for the
> reader.)

At least one of the readers posted a patch filling it in already.
Need to send out the version with the review comments addressed, but
I'm still waiting for Uli if he really insists on new syscall vectors
for the same structure.  Using that one ST_VALID bit seems a lot easier
to me.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/