linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] Inject asynchronous page fault into a guest if page is swapped out.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:09:21 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com,
	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, riel@...hat.com,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] Inject asynchronous page fault into a guest
 if page is swapped out.

On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:05 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > +   /* do alloc atomic since if we are going to sleep anyway we
> > > +      may as well sleep faulting in page */
> > > +   work = kmem_cache_zalloc(async_pf_cache, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > +   if (!work)
> > > +           return 0;
> > 
> > GFP_KERNEL is fine for this context.
> But it can sleep, no? The comment explains why I don't want to sleep
> here. 

In that case, use 0, no use wasting __GFP_HIGH on something that doesn't
actually need it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/