linux-kernel - Re: stable? quality assurance?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:44:37 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
	Marcin Letyns <mletyns@...il.com>
Subject: Re: stable? quality assurance?

Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> And when the combination of 2.6.33 now .6 and userspace software suspend 
> works for me - for the first time, often it was TuxOnIce that worked, but 
> not any in kernel method I tried from time to time - so be it for the time 
> being, even if userspace software suspend is way slower and doesn't 
> satisfy the disk on writing the image.

BTW, the need to rely on a quite fundamental kernel component that is
not in the mainline (for whichever reason) in the long term, almost
guarantees you a lot of recurring pain, one way or another.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- -=== -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/