linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Enable building defconfigs from Kconfig files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:22:52 +0200
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Enable building defconfigs from Kconfig files

On 07/13/2010 03:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After this change, doing a "make xxx_defconfig" will check first for
> a file called arch/<arch>/configs/Kconfig.xxx and use that to generate
> the .config (effectively starting from an allnoconfig).  If that file
> doesn't exist, it will use arch/<ARCH>/configs/xxx_defconfig as now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  scripts/kconfig/Makefile |   14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi Linus,
> 
> Is this more the direction you want to take?
> 
> There are still 2 main problems with is approach:
> 
> 	- there are some config options that are globally and
> unconditionally enabled that some platforms may not want.  The only way
> currently to turn them off is to reproduce the config entry with the
> different default.  I am not sure if we need a wa to turn them off or to
> just change them to being neede to be selected by those that do want them.
> 	- we have no way to select options that are neither bool or
> tristate to suitable values.  Again the only way to do that currently is
> to reproduce the config entry with a different default value.

Hi Stephen,

how are these Kconfig.xxx files going look like? A list of 'select FOO'
 and 'include "Kconfig.other"' statements?

What about adding support for an include statement to the .config file
format and using that in the defconfigs instead? The VARIABLE=VALUE
grammar seems much more suitable for this than the kconfig language.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/