Date:	Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:16:13 +0900
From:	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
CC:	KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>,
	Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] Add timekeeping documentation

Hi,

(2010/07/13 11:25), Zachary Amsden wrote:
> +
> +2.3) APIC
> +
> +On Pentium and later processors, an on-board timer is available to each CPU
> +as part of the Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller.  The APIC is
> +accessed through memory-mapped registers and provides interrupt service to each
> +CPU, used for IPIs and local timer interrupts.
> +
> +Although in theory the APIC is a safe and stable source for local interrupts,
> +in practice, many bugs and glitches have occurred due to the special nature of
> +the APIC CPU-local memory-mapped hardware.  Beware that CPU errata may affect
> +the use of the APIC and that workarounds may be required.  In addition, some of
> +these workarounds pose unique constraints for virtualization - requiring either
> +extra overhead incurred from extra reads of memory-mapped I/O or additional
> +functionality that may be more computationally expensive to implement.
> +
> +Since the APIC is documented quite well in the Intel and AMD manuals, we will
> +avoid repititon of the detail here.  It should be pointed out that the APIC

          repetition?

> +timer is programmed through the LVT (local vector timer) register, is capable
> +of one-shot or periodic operation, and is based on the bus clock divided down
> +by the programmable divider register.
> +
> +2.4) HPET
> +
> +HPET is quite complex, and was originally intended to replace the PIT / RTC
> +support of the X86 PC.  It remains to be seen whether that will be the case, as
> +the de facto standard of PC hardware is to emulate these older devices.  Some
> +systems designated as legacy free may support only the HPET as a hardware timer
> +device.
> +
> +The HPET spec is rather loose and vague, requiring at least 3 hardware timers,
> +but allowing implementation freedom to support many more.  It also imposes no
> +fixed rate on the timer frequency, but does impose some extremal values on
> +frequency, error and slew.
> +
> +In general, the HPET is recommended as a high precision (compared to PIT /RTC)
> +time source which is independent of local variation (as there is only one HPET
> +in any given system).  The HPET is also memory-mapped, and its presence is
> +indicated through ACPI tables by the BIOS.
> +
> +Detailed specification of the HPET is beyond the current scope of this
> +document, as it is also very well documented elsewhere.
> +


> +3.6) TSC and STPCLK / T-states
> +
> +External signals given to the processor may also have the affect of stopping

                                                              effect?

> +the TSC.  This is typically done for thermal emergency power control to prevent
> +an overheating condition, and typically, there is no way to detect that this
> +condition has happened.
> +


> +4.4) Migration
> +
> +Migration of a virtual machine raises problems for timekeeping in two ways.
> +First, the migration itself may take time, during which interrupts cannot be
> +delivered, and after which, the guest time may need to be caught up.  NTP may
> +be able to help to some degree here, as the clock correction required is
> +typically small enough to fall in the NTP-correctable window.
> +
> +An additional concern is that timers based off the TSC (or HPET, if the raw bus
> +clock is exposed) may now be running at different rates, requiring compensation
> +in some may in the hypervisor by virtualizing these timers.  In addition,

            way?

> +migrating to a faster machine may preclude the use of a passthrough TSC, as a
> +faster clock cannot be made visible to a guest without the potential of time
> +advancing faster than usual.  A slower clock is less of a problem, as it can
> +always be caught up to the original rate.  KVM clock avoids these problems by
> +simply storing multipliers and offsets gainst the TSC for the guest to convert

                                           against?

> +back into nanosecond resolution values.
> +


   Takuya

     -- I'm not English speaker, so not so sure about some places.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists