lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:27:41 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 7 On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:45:13 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi Andrew, Al, > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:20:42 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > Bug is still there. Reverting ""Make ->drop_inode() just return > > whether inode needs to be dropped" makes it go away. > > > > Al, please don't just dump crap in linux-next and then ignore bug reports. > > People are trying to get work done here. > > I will revert that commit in linux-next today if it is still there (and > not fixed). Reverting the patch didn't help - the patch moved the BUG_ON() from generic_delete_inode() into __iput_final(). With the patch reverted the kernel still goes BUG over the same test in generic_delete_inode(). It could be that the bug was caused by fs-writeback.c changes. David, do you have time to take a look at this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists