linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] writeback: sync old inodes first in background writeback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:52:10 +0800
From:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] writeback: sync old inodes first in background
 writeback

> Some insight on how the other writeback changes that are being floated
> around might affect the number of dirty pages reclaim encounters would also
> be helpful.

Here is an interesting related problem about the wait_on_page_writeback() call
inside shrink_page_list():

        http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/4/86

The problem is, wait_on_page_writeback() is called too early in the
direct reclaim path, which blocks many random/unrelated processes when
some slow (USB stick) writeback is on the way.

A simple dd can easily create a big range of dirty pages in the LRU
list. Therefore priority can easily go below (DEF_PRIORITY - 2) in a
typical desktop, which triggers the lumpy reclaim mode and hence
wait_on_page_writeback().

I proposed this patch at the time, which was confirmed to solve the problem:

--- linux-next.orig/mm/vmscan.c	2010-06-24 14:32:03.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/vmscan.c	2010-07-22 16:12:34.000000000 +0800
@@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ static void set_lumpy_reclaim_mode(int p
 	 */
 	if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
 		sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = 1;
-	else if (sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
+	else if (sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY / 2)
 		sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = 1;
 	else
 		sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = 0;


However KOSAKI and Minchan raised concerns about raising the bar.
I guess this new patch is more problem oriented and acceptable:

--- linux-next.orig/mm/vmscan.c	2010-07-22 16:36:58.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/vmscan.c	2010-07-22 16:39:57.000000000 +0800
@@ -1217,7 +1217,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
 			count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_active);
 
 			nr_freed += shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc,
-							PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC);
+					priority < DEF_PRIORITY / 3 ?
+					PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC : PAGEOUT_IO_ASYNC);
 		}
 
 		nr_reclaimed += nr_freed;

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/