linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:52:02 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED

> The following experimental patch changes the kernel mapping for ACPI tables
> to CACHED. This eliminates the page attibute conflict & allows users to map
> the tables CACHEABLE. This significantly speeds up boot:
> 
> 	38 minutes without the patch
> 	27 minutes with the patch
> 		~30% improvement
> 
> Time to run ACPIDUMP on a large system:
> 	527 seconds without the patch
> 	  8 seconds with the patch

Interesting.

Can you detect a performance differene on a 1-node machine
that doesn't magnify the penalty of the remote uncached access?

thanks,
-Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Cetner

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/