linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Don't apply for write lock on tasklist_lock if parent doesn't ptrace other processes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, andi.kleen@...el.com,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't apply for write lock on tasklist_lock if parent
	doesn't ptrace other processes

> So, this list_empty() check needs taskslit at least for reading. But, we
> are going to take it for writing right after exit_ptrace() returns, afaics
> we can add this fastpatch check for free.

That looks good to me, but it could use some more scare comments.

>  /*
> - * Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on.
> + * Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on. Called with tasklist held.

 * Called with tasklist held for writing, and returns with it held too.
 * But note it can release and reacquire the lock.

> +	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> +
	/*
	 * Note that exit_ptrace() might drop tasklist_lock and reacquire it.
	 */
>  	exit_ptrace(father);
>  
> -	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
>  	reaper = find_new_reaper(father);


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/