linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] workqueue: mark init_workqueues() as early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:29:00 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] workqueue: mark init_workqueues() as early_initcall()

Hello,

On 07/31/2010 02:48 AM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> hmm.. too many changes in linux-next.
> 
> Yes, as far as these patches are concerned, they work against linux-next
> aswell. Just posted -v2 which is on top of linux-next. ia64 also had the
> same issue, addressed in -v2 aswell.

I think it'll be best to route the changes through workqueue tree.
I'll audit init path and if everything looks okay will add the
workqueue patch to wq#for-next.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/