linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] Fix /proc/softirqs file formatting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:51:55 +0900
From:	Keika Kobayashi <kobayashi.kk@...s.nec.co.jp>
To:	dave@....org
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Fix /proc/softirqs file formatting

(2010/07/31 4:06), Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making it's value be printed too
> far to the right. This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit
> neater.
> 
> Currently:
>                 CPU0
>       HI:          0
>    TIMER:     599792
>   NET_TX:          2
>   NET_RX:          6
>    BLOCK:      80807
> BLOCK_IOPOLL:          0
>  TASKLET:      20012
>    SCHED:          0
>  HRTIMER:         63
>      RCU:     619279
> 
> With patch:
>                     CPU0
>           HI:          0
>        TIMER:     585582
>       NET_TX:          2
>       NET_RX:          6
>        BLOCK:      80320
> BLOCK_IOPOLL:          0
>      TASKLET:      19287
>        SCHED:          0
>      HRTIMER:         62
>          RCU:     604441
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr
>  
> 
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
> ---
>  fs/proc/softirqs.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> index 1807c24..3799473 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
>  {
>  	int i, j;
>  
> -	seq_printf(p, "                ");
> +	seq_printf(p, "                    ");
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
>  		seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i);
>  	seq_printf(p, "\n");
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
> -		seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
> +		seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
>  		for_each_possible_cpu(j)
>  			seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
>  		seq_printf(p, "\n");

Sorry for late response.

It looks good to me.

// Keika Kobayashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/