| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 21:40:48 +0200
From: stefani@...bold.net
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: stefani@...bold.net
Subject: [PATCH] Change struct flchip_shared spinlock locking into mutex
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
This patch prevent to schedule while atomic by changing the
flchip_shared spinlock into a mutex. This should be save since no atomic
path will use this lock.
This patch is based on linux kernel 2.6.35. Please apply.
It was requested by Arnd Bergmann and Vasiliy Kulikov.
- Stefani
shared->
Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
---
drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
include/linux/mtd/flashchip.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c
index 62f3ea9..3364061 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static int cfi_intelext_partition_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
chip = &newcfi->chips[0];
for (i = 0; i < cfi->numchips; i++) {
shared[i].writing = shared[i].erasing = NULL;
- spin_lock_init(&shared[i].lock);
+ mutex_init(&shared[i].lock);
for (j = 0; j < numparts; j++) {
*chip = cfi->chips[i];
chip->start += j << partshift;
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
*/
struct flchip_shared *shared = chip->priv;
struct flchip *contender;
- spin_lock(&shared->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&shared->lock);
contender = shared->writing;
if (contender && contender != chip) {
/*
@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
* get_chip returns success we're clear to go ahead.
*/
ret = mutex_trylock(&contender->mutex);
- spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
if (!ret)
goto retry;
mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
mutex_unlock(&contender->mutex);
return ret;
}
- spin_lock(&shared->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&shared->lock);
/* We should not own chip if it is already
* in FL_SYNCING state. Put contender and retry. */
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
* on this chip. Sleep. */
if (mode == FL_ERASING && shared->erasing
&& shared->erasing->oldstate == FL_ERASING) {
- spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
add_wait_queue(&chip->wq, &wait);
mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
shared->writing = chip;
if (mode == FL_ERASING)
shared->erasing = chip;
- spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
}
ret = chip_ready(map, chip, adr, mode);
if (ret == -EAGAIN)
@@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ static void put_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long ad
if (chip->priv) {
struct flchip_shared *shared = chip->priv;
- spin_lock(&shared->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&shared->lock);
if (shared->writing == chip && chip->oldstate == FL_READY) {
/* We own the ability to write, but we're done */
shared->writing = shared->erasing;
@@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static void put_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long ad
/* give back ownership to who we loaned it from */
struct flchip *loaner = shared->writing;
mutex_lock(&loaner->mutex);
- spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
put_chip(map, loaner, loaner->start);
mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
@@ -985,11 +985,11 @@ static void put_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long ad
* Don't let the switch below mess things up since
* we don't have ownership to resume anything.
*/
- spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
wake_up(&chip->wq);
return;
}
- spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
}
switch(chip->oldstate) {
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/flashchip.h b/include/linux/mtd/flashchip.h
index f43e9b4..23cc10f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mtd/flashchip.h
+++ b/include/linux/mtd/flashchip.h
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct flchip {
/* This is used to handle contention on write/erase operations
between partitions of the same physical chip. */
struct flchip_shared {
- spinlock_t lock;
+ struct mutex lock;
struct flchip *writing;
struct flchip *erasing;
};
--
1.7.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists