lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:35:35 +0800
From:	Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
CC:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: EFI runtime-services on x86_64

Hi Bjorn,

On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:58:48 +0800
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com> wrote:

> Hello Feng,
> 
> Can you educate me about your commit 772be899bc, "86: Make EFI RTC
> function depend on 32bit again"?
> 
> It adds "#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32" to avoid using efi_get_time() and
> efi_set_rtc_mmss(), but there's no explanation of *why* those services
> only work on 32-bit.
> 
> Is this an EFI spec limitation?  Do the other EFI runtime services
> work on 64-bit, since you didn't touch them?  Or do we just not use
> any of the others?
> 

Commit 772be899bc, "86: Make EFI RTC function depend on 32bit again" is
a regression fix for 7bd867d "x86: Move get/set_wallclock to x86_platform_ops".
These 2 commits just abstract the rtc service for legacy x86 PC/EFI/Virtualiation
kernel, and has no functional change to existing code.

I'm not familiar with EFI, but my understanding is current EFI code in 
kernel only provides the get/set_time service for x86_32 platform.

Cc Ying who is more familiar with EFI than me.

Thanks,
Feng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ