linux-kernel - Re: new gerneric kfifo API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:17:24 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	"Ira W. Snyder" <iws@...o.caltech.edu>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: new gerneric kfifo API

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:09:11PM +0200, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.08.2010, 12:46 -0700 schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:10:54AM +0200, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > once again. Kernel 2.6.35 is out and i want to know if there is play plan to
> > > merge the generic kfifo API. All complains was fixed, so there is no
> > > reason to shift the merge again. Please gibe me a short answer.
> > 
> > These have been in the -mm tree for a few major kernel releases now,
> > right?  And they are API safe, and only change the internals, right?
> > 
> > If so, I see no objection to merging them now, especially as you will be
> > around to fix up any problems that people have, right?  :)
> > 
> 
> right!

Great.  As Andrew doesn't have the time to send them on, want me to?  If
so, care to point me at them in his tree, or resend them to me?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/