| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 07:56:14 +0800 From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lp3971: remove unnecessary ret value checking in lp3971_i2c_write() 2010/8/5 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:22:13PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: >> 2010/8/5 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>: > >> > but can I once more renew my request that you make some effort to >> > provide subject lines for your patches which are consistent with the >> > standard used for the area of the kernel you're submitting to? > >> I think we have communication problem. >> I thought the subject "[PATCH 1/2] lp3971: remove unnecessary ret >> value checking in lp3971_i2c_write()" >> is pretty clear. >> Or do you mean something else? > > In this case pretty much every regulator API patch has a subject line > starting "regulator: " but none of your patches do this, you have > created your own style which you use over all your patches. > Got your point now. Will fix it next time. Thanks, Axel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists