| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 15:40:28 +0300 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com> To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arve@...roid.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz, florian@...kler.org, rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu, swetland@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, david@...g.hm, menage@...gle.com, david-b@...bell.net, James.Bottomley@...e.de, tytso@....edu, arjan@...radead.org, swmike@....pp.se, galibert@...ox.com, dipankar@...ibm.com Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > o "Ill-behaved application" AKA "untrusted application" AKA > "crappy application". > o "PM-driving application" are applications that are permitted > to acquire suspend blockers on Android. These definitions are wrong. 1) There are trusted applications that misbehave (the user clicks Yes when asked about PM permissions) 2) There are untrusted applications that are power optimized (The user clicks No) The proponents of suspend blockers in user-space have tried to ignore this fact, but the truth is that PM permissions and power optimization are orthogonal to each other. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists