linux-kernel - Re: [0/3] 2.6.27.52 stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:47:29 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [0/3] 2.6.27.52 stable review

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:12:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Machine is running, but there's a lot of these in the dmesg:
> >
> > WARNING: at include/linux/security.h:1826 acct_stack_growth+0xe7/0xf0()
> 
> That would seem to be because of the lack of commit 05fa199d45c in
> 2.6.27. It got marked for stable, but probably never went so far back
> as 2.6.27.

Yup, I didn't include it there.  Grant, if you add that, does the
warning go away?

> That said, I do wonder if it is worth it maintaining a 2.6.27 that the
> maintainer can't even boot on his machines any more.

Yeah, I'm beginning to wonder about it as well.  I think it's expected
lifespan is very near to the end.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/