| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:34:55 +1000 From: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [0/3] 2.6.27.52 stable review On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:47:29 -0700, you wrote: >On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:12:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com> wrote: >> > >> > Machine is running, but there's a lot of these in the dmesg: >> > >> > WARNING: at include/linux/security.h:1826 acct_stack_growth+0xe7/0xf0() >> >> That would seem to be because of the lack of commit 05fa199d45c in >> 2.6.27. It got marked for stable, but probably never went so far back >> as 2.6.27. > >Yup, I didn't include it there. Grant, if you add that, does the >warning go away? I'm sorry, no idea at all how to cherry pick that, I don't know git :( Google brings up this thread but not that commit, point me at it and I'll try it. Grant. > >> That said, I do wonder if it is worth it maintaining a 2.6.27 that the >> maintainer can't even boot on his machines any more. > >Yeah, I'm beginning to wonder about it as well. I think it's expected >lifespan is very near to the end. > >thanks, > >greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists