| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:22:25 +0200 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: lockdep false positive? -- firewire-core transaction timer vs. scsi-core host lock Johannes Berg wrote: > I'm convinced it's a false positive though, question is how to shut it > up :-) Is there anyway to differentiate the lockdep naming of shost->host_lock (initialized in scsi_host_alloc) at runtime by means of the scsi_host_template instance given to scsi_host_alloc? -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-=- =--- =---= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists