linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 01/20] Create generic alignment API (v8)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:25:26 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@...nd.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Imre Deak <imre.deak@...ia.com>,
	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/20] Create generic alignment API (v8)

On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 19:16 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

> +/*
> + * Align pointer on natural object alignment. Object size must be power of two.
> + */

Hmm, I wonder if we should add a compiler bug here too.

extern void __bug_obj_not_power_of_two(void);

({
	if ((sizeof(*obj) - 1) & sizeof(*obj))
		__bug_obj_not_power_of_two();
	PTR_ALIGN((obj), __alignof__(*(obj)));
})

> +#define object_align(obj)	PTR_ALIGN((obj), __alignof__(*(obj)))
> +#define object_align_floor(obj)	PTR_ALIGN_FLOOR((obj), __alignof__(*(obj)))
> +
> +/**
> + * offset_align - Calculate the offset needed to align an object on its natural
> + *                alignment towards higher addresses.
> + * @align_drift:  object offset from an "alignment"-aligned address.
> + * @alignment:    natural object alignment. Must be non-zero, power of 2.
> + *
> + * Returns the offset that must be added to align towards higher
> + * addresses.
> + */
> +static inline size_t offset_align(size_t align_drift, size_t alignment)
> +{
> +	return (alignment - align_drift) & (alignment - 1);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * offset_align_floor - Calculate the offset needed to align an object
> + *                      on its natural alignment towards lower addresses.
> + * @align_drift:  object offset from an "alignment"-aligned address.
> + * @alignment:    natural object alignment. Must be non-zero, power of 2.
> + *
> + * Returns the offset that must be substracted to align towards lower addresses.
> + */
> +static inline size_t offset_align_floor(size_t align_drift, size_t alignment)
> +{
> +	return (align_drift - alignment) & (alignment - 1);
> +}

I take it that theses functions can have variables passed to it for
alignment, thus a check wont help. Although, we could add a test for the
constant case.

-- Steve

> +


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/