| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:51:35 -0700
From: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, "greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>,
"ksrinivasan@...ell.com" <ksrinivasan@...ell.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, tsc: Limit CPU frequency calibration on AMD
Hi Boris,
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:34 -0700, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Date: Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:23:08PM -0400
>
> > calibrate_cpu() is AMD-specific, despite the generic name. (It is also,
> > strangely enough, only compiled on 64 bits for some reason???)
>
> Yeah, this is ancient stuff, who knows. I will test the fix on 32-bit
> too after we agree on the design tho.
>
> > Either which way, it is definitely not okay for the test for when the
> > code applies to be this distant from the code itself.
>
> Makes sense.
>
> > The easy way to fix this is to rename it amd_calibrate_cpu() and move
> > the applicability test into the routine itself. That is probably okay
> > as long as there are no other users. However, if there are other users,
> > then this really should move into x86_init and have a function pointer
> > associated with it.
>
> Right, do you have strong preferences between x86_init and x86_platform?
> The version below uses x86_platform because it has the calibrate_tsc()
> function in there too. Also, the version below nicely moves all that
> AMD-specific code to cpu/amd.c.
>
> I didn't opt for a calibrate_cpu_noop stub because I didn't want to
> pollute x86_init.c with yet another noop prototype. But I guess I should
> do that since the pointer testing is still executed while stubs are
> removed completely by smart compilers :).
>
> Anyway, the version below builds, I'll test tomorrow and send an
> official version then:
>
Thanks for doing this. I already had a patch ready doing just this,
though this change looks much nicer since you have moved all the code to
the amd file. Guess I just have to wait for you to do the noop stuff if
you are doing that. Once the patch is completed I can then just
initialize this func ptr to the noop routine when on VMware's platform.
Alok
> --
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> index baa579c..f00ed28 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ struct x86_cpuinit_ops {
> */
> struct x86_platform_ops {
> unsigned long (*calibrate_tsc)(void);
> + unsigned long (*calibrate_cpu)(void);
> unsigned long (*get_wallclock)(void);
> int (*set_wallclock)(unsigned long nowtime);
> void (*iommu_shutdown)(void);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> index 60a57b1..6478bd5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/apic.h>
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> +#include <asm/nmi.h>
> #include <asm/pci-direct.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> @@ -381,6 +382,56 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_amd_mc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> #endif
> }
>
> +/*
> + * calibrate_cpu is used on systems with fixed rate TSCs to determine
> + * processor frequency
> + */
> +#define TICK_COUNT 100000000
> +unsigned long __init amd_calibrate_cpu(void)
> +{
> + int tsc_start, tsc_now;
> + int i, no_ctr_free;
> + unsigned long evntsel3 = 0, pmc3 = 0, pmc_now = 0;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> + if (avail_to_resrv_perfctr_nmi_bit(i))
> + break;
> + no_ctr_free = (i == 4);
> + if (no_ctr_free) {
> + WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "Warning: AMD perfctrs busy ... "
> + "cpu_khz value may be incorrect.\n");
> + i = 3;
> + rdmsrl(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3, evntsel3);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3, 0);
> + rdmsrl(MSR_K7_PERFCTR3, pmc3);
> + } else {
> + reserve_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i);
> + reserve_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i);
> + }
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + /* start measuring cycles, incrementing from 0 */
> + wrmsrl(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i, 0);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i, 1 << 22 | 3 << 16 | 0x76);
> + rdtscl(tsc_start);
> + do {
> + rdmsrl(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i, pmc_now);
> + tsc_now = get_cycles();
> + } while ((tsc_now - tsc_start) < TICK_COUNT);
> +
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + if (no_ctr_free) {
> + wrmsrl(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3, 0);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_K7_PERFCTR3, pmc3);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3, evntsel3);
> + } else {
> + release_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i);
> + release_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i);
> + }
> +
> + return pmc_now * tsc_khz / (tsc_now - tsc_start);
> +}
> +
> static void __cpuinit early_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> {
> early_init_amd_mc(c);
> @@ -412,6 +463,23 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_EXTD_APICID);
> }
> #endif
> +
> + /*
> + * We can check for constant TSC CPUID bit here since this bit is
> + * introduced with F10h.
> + */
> + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)) {
> +
> + if (c->x86 > 0x10 ||
> + (c->x86 == 0x10 && c->x86_model >= 0x2)) {
> + u64 val;
> +
> + rdmsrl(MSR_K7_HWCR, val);
> + if (!(val & BIT(24)))
> + x86_platform.calibrate_cpu = amd_calibrate_cpu;
> + }
> + } else
> + x86_platform.calibrate_cpu = amd_calibrate_cpu;
> }
>
> static void __cpuinit init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> index 41b2b8b..1915706 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -854,60 +854,6 @@ static void __init init_tsc_clocksource(void)
> clocksource_register_khz(&clocksource_tsc, tsc_khz);
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -/*
> - * calibrate_cpu is used on systems with fixed rate TSCs to determine
> - * processor frequency
> - */
> -#define TICK_COUNT 100000000
> -static unsigned long __init calibrate_cpu(void)
> -{
> - int tsc_start, tsc_now;
> - int i, no_ctr_free;
> - unsigned long evntsel3 = 0, pmc3 = 0, pmc_now = 0;
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> - if (avail_to_resrv_perfctr_nmi_bit(i))
> - break;
> - no_ctr_free = (i == 4);
> - if (no_ctr_free) {
> - WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "Warning: AMD perfctrs busy ... "
> - "cpu_khz value may be incorrect.\n");
> - i = 3;
> - rdmsrl(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3, evntsel3);
> - wrmsrl(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3, 0);
> - rdmsrl(MSR_K7_PERFCTR3, pmc3);
> - } else {
> - reserve_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i);
> - reserve_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i);
> - }
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> - /* start measuring cycles, incrementing from 0 */
> - wrmsrl(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i, 0);
> - wrmsrl(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i, 1 << 22 | 3 << 16 | 0x76);
> - rdtscl(tsc_start);
> - do {
> - rdmsrl(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i, pmc_now);
> - tsc_now = get_cycles();
> - } while ((tsc_now - tsc_start) < TICK_COUNT);
> -
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> - if (no_ctr_free) {
> - wrmsrl(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3, 0);
> - wrmsrl(MSR_K7_PERFCTR3, pmc3);
> - wrmsrl(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3, evntsel3);
> - } else {
> - release_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i);
> - release_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i);
> - }
> -
> - return pmc_now * tsc_khz / (tsc_now - tsc_start);
> -}
> -#else
> -static inline unsigned long calibrate_cpu(void) { return cpu_khz; }
> -#endif
> -
> void __init tsc_init(void)
> {
> u64 lpj;
> @@ -926,19 +872,8 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) &&
> - (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)) {
> -
> - if (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 0x10 ||
> - (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10 &&
> - boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x2)) {
> - u64 val;
> -
> - rdmsrl(MSR_K7_HWCR, val);
> - if (!(val & BIT(24)))
> - cpu_khz = calibrate_cpu();
> - }
> - }
> + if (x86_platform.calibrate_cpu)
> + cpu_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_cpu();
>
> printk("Detected %lu.%03lu MHz processor.\n",
> (unsigned long)cpu_khz / 1000,
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists