linux-kernel - Re: workqueue destruction BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:35:34 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: workqueue destruction BUG_ON

Hello,

On 08/24/2010 12:37 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> I think in my iwlwifi case it's actually destroying the iwlwifi
> workqueue (not sure why it even exists though).

Yeah, I'm planning on auditing each workqueue and remove unnecessary
ones.

>> I'll prep a debug patch to print out some details.
> 
> That'd be helpful, thanks!

Can you please apply the following patch and report the result?

Thanks.

>From 492a242b75b0abae3b1c17b4a654ab9ef67e612d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:22:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: improve destroy_workqueue() debuggability

Now that the worklist is global, having works pending after wq
destruction can easily lead to oops and destroy_workqueue() have
several BUG_ON()s to catch these cases.  Unfortunately, BUG_ON()
doesn't tell much about how the work became pending after the final
flush_workqueue().

This patch adds WQ_DYING which is set before the final flush begins
and WARN_ON_ONCE() is triggered if a work is requested to be queued on
a dying workqueue and the request is ignored.  This clearly indicates
which caller is trying to queue a work on a dying workqueue and keeps
the system working in most cases.

Locking rule comment is updated such that the 'I' rule includes
modifying the field from destruction path.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/workqueue.h |    2 ++
 kernel/workqueue.c        |    7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 4f9d277..c959666 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ enum {
 	WQ_HIGHPRI		= 1 << 4, /* high priority */
 	WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE	= 1 << 5, /* cpu instensive workqueue */

+	WQ_DYING		= 1 << 6, /* internal: workqueue is dying */
+
 	WQ_MAX_ACTIVE		= 512,	  /* I like 512, better ideas? */
 	WQ_MAX_UNBOUND_PER_CPU	= 4,	  /* 4 * #cpus for unbound wq */
 	WQ_DFL_ACTIVE		= WQ_MAX_ACTIVE / 2,
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index cc3456f..362b50d 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ enum {
 /*
  * Structure fields follow one of the following exclusion rules.
  *
- * I: Set during initialization and read-only afterwards.
+ * I: Modifiable by initialization/destruction paths and read-only for
+ *    everyone else.
  *
  * P: Preemption protected.  Disabling preemption is enough and should
  *    only be modified and accessed from the local cpu.
@@ -944,6 +945,9 @@ static void __queue_work(unsigned int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,

 	debug_work_activate(work);

+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(wq->flags & WQ_DYING))
+		return;
+
 	/* determine gcwq to use */
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
 		struct global_cwq *last_gcwq;
@@ -2828,6 +2832,7 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu;

+	wq->flags |= WQ_DYING;
 	flush_workqueue(wq);

 	/*
-- 
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/