linux-kernel - Re: AMD Geode NOPL emulation for kernel 2.6.36-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:52:49 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	Matteo Croce <matteo@...nwrt.org>,
	Thomas Backlund <tmb@...driva.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Natale Vinto <ebballon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: AMD Geode NOPL emulation for kernel 2.6.36-rc2

  On 08/28/2010 02:07 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/27/2010 02:32 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
>> can I ignore the return value when I expect val to be non zero?
>> the doc says: "On error, the variable @x is set to zero."
> No.  You need to deliver a page fault to the application in this case.
>
> The *real* test for this kind of crap is correct page fault behavior,
> and so forth.
>
> Also, at the very least you need to check for:
>
> - CS == USER_CS

Is that mandated by the ABI?  Is it illegal for an application to load a 
segment with a nonzero base into the LDT and use it for CS?

What about vm86?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/