lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:49:10 -0400
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
To:	Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
CC:	sri@...ibm.com, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: prevent reading out-of-bounds memory

On 09/03/2010 10:47 AM, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> Ugh, just remembered the port number is also dereferenced, so the
> second of these two checks needs to be expanded to the size of a
> sockaddr_in.  Note to self: don't write patches on too little sleep.
> Apologies for the unnecessary traffic.
> 

Actually, you can move that down.  Otherwise, we'd end up executing the same code
twice which is just silly.

So, the code should be like this:
	1.  see if we can get the address family.
	2.  Get the address family.
	3.  see if we get the sockaddr of appropriate size,
	4.  Get that structure.
	5.  reference fields.

-vlad

> Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
> 
> --- linux-2.6.35.4.orig/net/sctp/socket.c	2010-09-03 08:58:48.127080114 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.35.4/net/sctp/socket.c	2010-09-03 10:45:08.467098052 -0400
> @@ -916,6 +916,12 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
>  	/* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>  	addr_buf = kaddrs;
>  	while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
> +
> +		if (walk_size + sizeof(sa_family_t) > addrs_size) {
> +			kfree(kaddrs);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
>  		sa_addr = (struct sockaddr *)addr_buf;
>  		af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa_family);
> 
> @@ -1002,6 +1008,12 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
>  	/* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>  	addr_buf = kaddrs;
>  	while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
> +
> +		if (walk_size + sizeof(struct sockaddr_in) > addrs_size) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto out_free;
> +		}
> +
>  		sa_addr = (union sctp_addr *)addr_buf;
>  		af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa.sa_family);
>  		port = ntohs(sa_addr->v4.sin_port);
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Dan Rosenberg
> <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com> wrote:
>> Ha, I knew there was an easier way.  Take two:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
>>
>> --- linux-2.6.35.4.orig/net/sctp/socket.c       2010-09-03 08:58:48.127080114 -0400
>> +++ linux-2.6.35.4/net/sctp/socket.c    2010-09-03 10:28:14.929595312 -0400
>> @@ -916,6 +916,12 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
>>        /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>>        addr_buf = kaddrs;
>>        while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
>> +
>> +               if (walk_size + sizeof(sa_family_t) > addrs_size) {
>> +                       kfree(kaddrs);
>> +                       return -EINVAL;
>> +               }
>> +
>>                sa_addr = (struct sockaddr *)addr_buf;
>>                af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa_family);
>>
>> @@ -1002,6 +1008,12 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
>>        /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>>        addr_buf = kaddrs;
>>        while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
>> +
>> +               if (walk_size + sizeof(sa_family_t) > addrs_size) {
>> +                       err = -EINVAL;
>> +                       goto out_free;
>> +               }
>> +
>>                sa_addr = (union sctp_addr *)addr_buf;
>>                af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa.sa_family);
>>                port = ntohs(sa_addr->v4.sin_port);
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Hm.. we already validate that we have the proper amount of space for a given sockaddr.
>>> The only thing we are missing is making sure that there is room to get the proper address
>>> family and I think you can do that without adding any extra variables:
>>>
>>>        if (walk_size + sizeof(sa_family_t) > addr_size) {
>>>                /* Not enough room for address family */
>>>                kfree(kaddrs);
>>>                return -EINVAL;
>>>        }
>>>
>>> -vlad
>>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Vlad Yasevich
>> <vladislav.yasevich@...com> wrote:
>>> On 09/03/2010 09:48 AM, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
>>>> Two user-controlled allocations in SCTP are subsequently dereferenced
>>>> as sockaddr structs, without checking if the dereferenced struct
>>>> members fall beyond the end of the allocated chunk.  There doesn't
>>>> appear to be any information leakage here based on how these members
>>>> are used and additional checking, but it's still worth fixing.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> --- linux-2.6.35.4.orig/net/sctp/socket.c     2010-09-03 08:58:48.127080114 -0400
>>>> +++ linux-2.6.35.4/net/sctp/socket.c  2010-09-03 09:22:06.337096825 -0400
>>>> @@ -889,6 +889,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
>>>>       int err;
>>>>       int addrcnt = 0;
>>>>       int walk_size = 0;
>>>> +     unsigned int remaining = addrs_size;
>>>>       struct sockaddr *sa_addr;
>>>>       void *addr_buf;
>>>>       struct sctp_af *af;
>>>> @@ -916,6 +917,13 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
>>>>       /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>>>>       addr_buf = kaddrs;
>>>>       while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
>>>> +
>>>> +             /* Don't read out-of-bounds memory */
>>>> +             if (remaining < sizeof(struct sockaddr)) {
>>>> +                     kfree(kaddrs);
>>>> +                     return -EINVAL;
>>>> +             }
>>>> +
>>>>               sa_addr = (struct sockaddr *)addr_buf;
>>>>               af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa_family);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -929,6 +937,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
>>>>               addrcnt++;
>>>>               addr_buf += af->sockaddr_len;
>>>>               walk_size += af->sockaddr_len;
>>>> +             remaining -= af->sockaddr_len;
>>>>       }
>>>>
>>>>       /* Do the work. */
>>>> @@ -984,6 +993,7 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
>>>>       void *addr_buf;
>>>>       unsigned short port;
>>>>       unsigned int f_flags = 0;
>>>> +     unsigned int remaining = addrs_size;
>>>>
>>>>       sp = sctp_sk(sk);
>>>>       ep = sp->ep;
>>>> @@ -1002,6 +1012,13 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
>>>>       /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>>>>       addr_buf = kaddrs;
>>>>       while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
>>>> +
>>>> +             /* Don't read out-of-bounds memory */
>>>> +             if (remaining < sizeof(union sctp_addr)) {
>>>> +                     err = -EINVAL;
>>>> +                     goto out_free;
>>>> +             }
>>>> +
>>>>               sa_addr = (union sctp_addr *)addr_buf;
>>>>               af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa.sa_family);
>>>>               port = ntohs(sa_addr->v4.sin_port);
>>>> @@ -1101,6 +1118,7 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
>>>>               addrcnt++;
>>>>               addr_buf += af->sockaddr_len;
>>>>               walk_size += af->sockaddr_len;
>>>> +             remaining -= af->sockaddr_len;
>>>>       }
>>>>
>>>>       /* In case the user of sctp_connectx() wants an association
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ