| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:57:40 -0600 From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> To: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com> Cc: Masayuki Ohtak <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>, meego-dev@...go.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>, qi.wang@...el.com, yong.y.wang@...el.com, andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, gregkh@...e.de, Tomoya MORINAGA <morinaga526@....okisemi.com> Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_SPI driver to 2.6.35 On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com> wrote: > 2010/9/3 Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>: >> 2010/9/3 Masayuki Ohtak <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>: >>> SPI driver of Topcliff PCH > >> Instead, the majority of the code should be structured to handle one >> and only one spi bus instance. Only at the top level pci probe, >> remove and PM code should there be for() loops for setting up or >> tearing down each spi bus instance one at a time. > > I guess an elegant way to achieve this is to have the > PCI driver spawn a simple platform device for each bus. > Then you can even break the driver for that platform device > into its own file and all. Yes, that is exactly what I mean. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists