linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/2][BUGFIX] fix memory isolation notifier return value check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:48:14 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
	Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2][BUGFIX] fix memory isolation notifier return value
 check

On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:57:13 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Sorry, the 3rd patch for this set.

What happened with "[PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more
conformable with offlining code"?  You mentioned sending an updated
one, but I can't immediately find it.

Also, please do describe the impact of the problems which are being
fixed.  It helps me decide on priority and on
which-kernels-need-the-patch and it helps others when deciding
should-i-backport-this-into-my-kernel.

I think it'd be best to resend all of this, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/