linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/12] x86-64: Disable preemption when using TS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri,  3 Sep 2010 21:17:12 -0400
From:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To:	hpa@...or.com
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, penberg@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] x86-64: Disable preemption when using TS_USEDFPU

Consolidates code and fixes the below race for 64-bit.

commit 9fa2f37bfeb798728241cc4a19578ce6e4258f25
Author: torvalds <torvalds>
Date:   Tue Sep 2 07:37:25 2003 +0000

    Be a lot more careful about TS_USEDFPU and preemption

    We had some races where we testecd (or set) TS_USEDFPU together
    with sequences that depended on the setting (like clearing or
    setting the TS flag in %cr0) and we could be preempted in between,
    which screws up the FPU state, since preemption will itself change
    USEDFPU and the TS flag.

    This makes it a lot more explicit: the "internal" low-level FPU
    functions ("__xxxx_fpu()") all require preemption to be disabled,
    and the exported "real" functions will make sure that is the case.

    One case - in __switch_to() - was switched to the non-preempt-safe
    internal version, since the scheduler itself has already disabled
    preemption.

    BKrev: 3f5448b5WRiQuyzAlbajs3qoQjSobw

Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h  |   15 ---------------
 arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
index 88065e3..8b40a83 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
@@ -387,19 +387,6 @@ static inline void irq_ts_restore(int TS_state)
 		stts();
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-
-static inline void save_init_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	__save_init_fpu(tsk);
-	stts();
-}
-
-#define unlazy_fpu	__unlazy_fpu
-#define clear_fpu	__clear_fpu
-
-#else  /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
-
 /*
  * These disable preemption on their own and are safe
  */
@@ -425,8 +412,6 @@ static inline void clear_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
-#endif	/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
-
 /*
  * i387 state interaction
  */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index 3d9ea53..b3d7a3a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
 	load_TLS(next, cpu);
 
 	/* Must be after DS reload */
-	unlazy_fpu(prev_p);
+	__unlazy_fpu(prev_p);
 
 	/* Make sure cpu is ready for new context */
 	if (preload_fpu)
-- 
1.7.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/