linux-kernel - Re: [KVM timekeeping] Revert getnsboottime() kernel API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:26:28 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KVM timekeeping] Revert getnsboottime() kernel API

  On 09/04/2010 06:43 AM, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Never got any feedback on this.  I don't really have a strong opinion 
> on it either way, but I'll need to know which way to go with my 
> rebased patches. 

Applied it, thanks.

> Also nice if we can avoid polluting upstream with unnecessary changes.

Yes.

>
> I believe it would suffice also to revert these two commits:
>
> 2616ac0be4b12bf31cfe8880a5b21c5a2da7d150
> b8a578a03d18fab78ea1f79886e32c90f1d071a1
>

This is what I did.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/