linux-kernel - Re: [rfc patch] treewide: Convert "static const char <*> foo[] =" to "static const char <*> const foo[] ="

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:33:28 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc patch] treewide: Convert "static const char <*> foo[] ="
 to "static const char <*> const foo[] ="

On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 15:16 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 14:48, Joe Perches wrote:
> > could be warned by checkpatch
> i dont think you even need to check the contents.  just match the base:
> char foo[]
> const char *foo[]
> we want to catch these even if it isnt static, and catching the
> forward decl would be useful too.

I think that's not so good.
There are times when a default is used but then modified.

For instance:
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/comedi_bond.c:           char file[] = "/dev/comediXXXXXX";

> your perl hack isnt quite right.

The script I posted doesn't eat that whitespace.
The diff I sent you did.  I wouldn't post that.

> how about making a coccinelle patch ?

Not necessary I think.
If Julia or anyone else wants to, no objection.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/