[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:34:31 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
CC: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: DMA: Add plat_extra_sync_for_cpu()
Hello.
On 09-09-2010 3:02, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> On noncoherent processors with a readahead cache, an extra platform-
> specific invalidation is required during the dma_sync_*_for_cpu()
> operations to keep drivers from seeing stale prefetched data.
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee<cernekee@...il.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h
> index 17d5794..8192683 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,19 @@ static inline void plat_extra_sync_for_device(struct device *dev)
> mb();
> }
>
> +static inline void plat_extra_sync_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
> + dma_addr_t dma_handle, unsigned long offset, size_t size,
> + enum dma_data_direction direction)
> +{
> + return;
Why not just empty function bodies?
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists