[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:33:06 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Hugepage migration (v5)
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:19:31 +0900
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the 5th version of "hugepage migration" set.
>
> Changes from v4 (mostly refactoring):
> - remove unnecessary might_sleep() [3/10]
> - define migrate_huge_pages() from copy of migrate_pages() [4/10]
> - soft_offline_page() branches off to hugepage path. [8/10]
I went over this patchkit again and it all looks good to me.
I plan to merge it through my hwpoison tree.
As far as I understand all earlier comments have been addressed
with this revision, correct?
Thanks for your work, this is very good.
But I would like to have some Acks from Christoph for the
page migration changes and from Mel for the hugetlb changes
outside memory-failures.c. Are the patches ok for you two?
Can I have your Acked-by or Reviewed-by?
Any other comments would be welcome too.
I am considering to fast track 10/10 (the page-types fix).
I think the other bug fixes in the series are only for bugs added
earlier in the series, correct?
Thanks,
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists