linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #17772] Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:45:37 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	zersaa <zersaa@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #17772] Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *

On 09/12/2010 01:29 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> 
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17772
>> Subject		: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
>> Submitter	: zersaa <zersaa@...il.com>
>> Date		: 2010-09-04 21:28 (9 days old)
> 
> this is an error message introduced via ACPI commit:
> 
> | commit 2a4ab640d3c28c2952967e5f63ea495555bf2a5f
> | Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> | Date:   Tue Jul 7 23:01:15 2009 -0400
> |
> |     ACPI, x86: expose some IO-APIC routines when CONFIG_ACPI=n
> 
> It's not clear from the bugzilla entry whether it's just a new error 
> message, or an actual boot failure. It appears to me it's just a new 
> message - i.e. not a regression.
> 

can you post whole bootlog with "debug apic=debug"?

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/