linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] vfs: make i_op->permission take a dentry instead of an inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:44:09 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	vaurora@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] vfs: make i_op->permission take a dentry instead of an inode

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:41:18 +0200, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> 
> Like most other inode operations ->permission() should take a dentry
> instead of an inode.  This is necessary for filesystems which operate
> on names not on inodes.
> 

This change will also help 9P patch series i am doing 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1032788

Currently ACL values are fetched from the server as a part of inode
initialization. We can't do it in inode operations->permission because
we need dentry to do 9P operations. Having inode operations->permission
take a dentry instead of an inode help there.

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/