linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: add possibility for cyclic transfers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:42:20 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: add possibility for cyclic transfers

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Any comment to this patch?

Looks good to me especially given the unique implications for
callbacks.  Although, I'd like to put a description of the
prep_dma_cyclic semantics in the source code.  Can you respin this
with a description added to the kernel-doc for struct dma_device?

--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/