linux-kernel - Re: Deadlock in Bluetooth code in 2.6.36

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	padovan@...fusion.mobi
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marcel@...tmann.org,
	mathewm@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: Deadlock in Bluetooth code in 2.6.36

From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@...fusion.mobi>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:20:12 -0300

> My questions here is on how to fix this properly. Maybe
> sock_alloc_send_skb() should not be used with SOCK_STREAM and reliable
> protocols and I'm not aware of that? And should I use something like
> sk_stream_alloc_skb() instead?
> 
> Any comments are welcome. With lucky we can fix that for 2.6.36 and
> together with others fixes we have queued deliver a fully functional
> L2CAP layer on 2.6.36.

Use sock_alloc_send_skb() as you do now, but if it fails wait for socket
space to become available just like TCP does, then loop back and try to
allocate again if the space-wait doesn't return an error.

I think you should be able to reuse sk_stream_wait_memory() for this
purpose just fine and without any problems.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/