linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] Fs: ext4: acl.c: fixed indent issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:45:32 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	T Dent <tdent48227@...il.com>, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	jack@...e.cz, dmonakhov@...nvz.org, sandeen@...hat.com,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Fs: ext4: acl.c: fixed indent issue

On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 22:21 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> P.S.  This is also completely insane:
>     --git-min-percent => minimum percentage of commits required (default: 5)
> Anyone who has 5% of the commits should be considered a maintainer?!?

Probably --git-min-signatures=1 isn't high enough either.

I have no issue changing those to whatever is appropriate.

I believe the only person to comment on the % before
was Mark Brown, who might have suggested that number.

There've always been tradeoffs between activity on the file,
direct maintainership and reasonable accuracy of patterns.

Today, patterns are mostly reasonable, except for arch/arm/.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/