| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:12:26 -0700 From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>, Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: speedup twl4030 irq response time and decrease irq disable time On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:01:32PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > 2010/9/28 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>: > > Have you raised this issue with the genirq guys? This sounds like > > something that the core infrastructure should be able to cope with. > Even genirq guys can help us to convert to irq thread framework, I > don't think there is good way to set priority for one irq thread. What I'm saying is that this sounds like something it's reasonable to want to do so if there's no way currently to get high priority handling of timing sensitive interrupt controllers it'd be good if there could be. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists