linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Restrict size of page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 08:58:58 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Restrict size of page_cgroup->flags

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:53:14 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> I propose restricting page_cgroup.flags to 16 bits. The patch for the
> same is below. Comments?
> 
> 
> Restrict the bits usage in page_cgroup.flags
> 
> From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Restricting the flags helps control growth of the flags unbound.
> Restriciting it to 16 bits gives us the possibility of merging
> cgroup id with flags (atomicity permitting) and saving a whole
> long word in page_cgroup
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Doesn't make sense until you show the usage of existing bits.
And I guess 16bit may be too large on 32bit systems.

Nack for now.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/