[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:06:08 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
pedrib@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:34:50PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 10/10/2010 03:08 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I did it intentionally not split up because a split up is unlikely
> > to be bisectable. I think there is no need for any splitups.
>
> Shrug. The main encryption thread and ESSIV per-cpu are two separate
> things from my point of view.
Is not obvious to me.
>
> Anyway, the ball is on DM maintainer's playground now.
Well I was told already for 2.6.35 it was ready to merge
(and also I already have an active user base, people are using
it because it's solving a wide spread problem)
I am frankly somewhat surprised things should be suddenly
completely open now again and such contortions as you
did to the patch should be needed.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists