linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] CFS Bandwidth Control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:14:13 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] CFS Bandwidth Control

On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:19:10 +0530
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Its been a while since we posted CPS hard limits (aka CFS bandwidth control
> now) patches, hence a quick recap first:
> 
> - I have been working on CFS hard limits since last year and have posted
>   a few versions of the same (last post: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/5/44)
> - Paul Turner and Nikhil Rao meanwhile started working on CFS bandwidth
>   control and have posted a couple of versions.
>   (last post v2: http://lwn.net/Articles/385055/)
> 
> Paul's approach mainly changed the way the CPU hard limit was represented. After
> his post, I decided to work with them and discontinue my patch series since
> their global bandwidth specification for group appears more flexible than
> the RT-type per-cpu bandwidth specification I had in my series.
> 
> Since Paul seems to be busy, I am taking the freedom of posting the next
> version of his patches with a few enhancements to the slack time handling.
> (more on this later)
> 
Wow, thank you. I've been looking forward to see updates.
I'll try this set.

Regards,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/