lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:15:57 +0400
From:	"Gleb O. Raiko" <raiko@...si.msk.ru>
To:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
CC:	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
	Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@...ox.com>,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	chris@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 5/9] MIPS: sync after cacheflush



On 19.10.2010 13:17, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:54:33PM +0400, Gleb O. Raiko wrote:
> The MIPS32 BIS v2.6 spec says on page 92:
>
>    "The CACHE instruction and the memory transactions which are sourced by
>     the CACHE instruction, such as cache refill or cache writeback, obey
>     the ordering and completion rules of the SYNC instruction."
>
> That's not as clearly spelt out as one would like but it seems to imply
> that only reads/writes preceeding the CACHE instruction are guaranteed
> to have completed that is the last CACHE instruction that was executed
> may still be incomplete.

I meant another piece:

"For implementations which implement multiple level of caches  ... 
<speaking about inclusive caches here> ... The software must place a 
SYNC instruction after the CACHE instruction whenever there are possible 
writebacks from the inner cache to ensure that the writeback data is 
resident in the outer cache before operating on the
outer cache. ... <the rest of statement is a bogeyman story about not 
doing so>

For implementations which implement muliple level of caches without the 
inclusion property, the use of a SYNC instruction after the CACHE 
instruction is still needed whenever writeback data has to be resident 
in the next level of memory hierarchy."

It seems the last sentence shall be also applied for inclusive caches too.

Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ