linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Prevent unloadable modules from using trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:47:56 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Prevent unloadable modules from using
 trace_bprintk()

On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 05:42 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> > +/*
> > + * Module code must not use trace_bprintk, because if it is unloaded
> > + * then we leave a pointer back to the module code inside
> > + * the ring buffer, and then reading the ring buffer may cause a bug.
> > + *
> > + * We do allow for modules to use it if the kernel does not allow
> > + * unloading of modules, and MODVERSIONS is set (to make sure kernel
> > + * and module are the same). If you load modules without MODVERSIONS
> > + * set, then you deserve what you get.
> > + */
> > +#if defined(MODULE) &&							\
> 
> 
> 
> Did you mean CONFIG_MODULE may be?

Nope, then the a kernel that allows modules wont use it. I do mean
"MODULE", as in defined by the Makefile:

KBUILD_AFLAGS_MODULE  := -DMODULE
KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE  := -DMODULE

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/