lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:13:27 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: error importing i2c quilt series

Hi Jean,

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:25:19 +0200 Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
>
> I thought it was NEXT_BASE, with an underscore not dash?

Ah, yes, sorry ... (but my scripts actually handle either)

> And I also expected the trees to be merged in the order shows in:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git;a=blob;f=Next/Trees;hb=HEAD
> 
> As pci is listed before i2c, I (wrongly) concluded that everything
> would be fine even without using NEXT_BASE. I stand corrected.

What actually happens is
	I fetch all the trees and quilt series
	I import the quilt series to git branches
	I merge the trees.

So you cannot depend on the merge order (which sometimes changes as
well).  This makes sense since I have no influence over the order that
the trees get merged by Linus ... If there are dependencies, they need to
be explicit, sorry, using NEXT_BASE in quilt series or merging (sub)
trees for git.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ