lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:59:45 +0200
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
	amit.kucheria@...onical.com, eric@...rea.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: Fix GPIO_1_xx settings that are wrongly
	assumed

Hello Dinh,

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 03:02:17PM -0500, Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com wrote:
> From: Dinh Nguyen <Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com>
> 
> Its not a same assumption that because because 1 gpio mux is at
> mux mode 1, that it is the same for all gpio's. Freescale HW
> engineers like to keep things interesting by varying the mux mode
> of the gpio's.
> 
> Reference: The iomux-mx51.h file is generated from a script that
> converts the pin mode file from the SoC HW designers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-mx51.h |   16 ++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-mx51.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-mx51.h
> index e46b1c2..056ba0f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-mx51.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-mx51.h
> @@ -368,18 +368,18 @@ typedef enum iomux_config {
>  							MX51_SDHCI_PAD_CTRL)
>  #define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_0__GPIO_1_0		IOMUX_PAD(0x7B4, 0x3AC, 1, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
>  #define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_1__GPIO_1_1		IOMUX_PAD(0x7B8, 0x3B0, 1, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> -#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_2__GPIO_1_2		IOMUX_PAD(0x7D4, 0x3CC, 1, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> +#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_2__GPIO_1_2		IOMUX_PAD(0x7D4, 0x3CC, 0, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
>  #define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_2__I2C2_SCL		IOMUX_PAD(0x7D4, 0x3CC, (2 | IOMUX_CONFIG_SION), \
>  							0x9b8,   3, MX51_I2C_PAD_CTRL)
> -#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_3__GPIO_1_3		IOMUX_PAD(0x7D8, 0x3D0, 1, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> +#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_3__GPIO_1_3		IOMUX_PAD(0x7D8, 0x3D0, 0, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
>  #define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_3__I2C2_SDA		IOMUX_PAD(0x7D8, 0x3D0, (2 | IOMUX_CONFIG_SION), \
>  							0x9bc,   3, MX51_I2C_PAD_CTRL)
>  #define MX51_PAD_PMIC_INT_REQ__PMIC_INT_REQ	IOMUX_PAD(0x7FC, 0x3D4, 0, 0x0,   0, NO_PAD_CTRL)
> -#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_4__GPIO_1_4		IOMUX_PAD(0x804, 0x3D8, 1, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> -#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_5__GPIO_1_5		IOMUX_PAD(0x808, 0x3DC, 1, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> -#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_6__GPIO_1_6		IOMUX_PAD(0x80C, 0x3E0, 1, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> -#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_7__GPIO_1_7		IOMUX_PAD(0x810, 0x3E4, 1, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> -#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_8__GPIO_1_8		IOMUX_PAD(0x814, 0x3E8, 1, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> -#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_9__GPIO_1_9		IOMUX_PAD(0x818, 0x3EC, 1, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> +#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_4__GPIO_1_4		IOMUX_PAD(0x804, 0x3D8, 0, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> +#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_5__GPIO_1_5		IOMUX_PAD(0x808, 0x3DC, 0, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> +#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_6__GPIO_1_6		IOMUX_PAD(0x80C, 0x3E0, 0, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> +#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_7__GPIO_1_7		IOMUX_PAD(0x810, 0x3E4, 0, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> +#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_8__GPIO_1_8		IOMUX_PAD(0x814, 0x3E8, 0, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
> +#define MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_9__GPIO_1_9		IOMUX_PAD(0x818, 0x3EC, 0, 0x0,   0, MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL)
Before b545d9ed1b92f169d0326afac091328be5e76620 the muxmode entries were
correct.  Back when I looked at the patch that resulted into b545d9ed1b9
I wondered if the intended change was only
s/NO_PAD_CTRL/MX51_GPIO_PAD_CTRL/ but didn't check the reference manual.

Eric?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ