linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vhost: TX used buffer guest signal accumulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:40:50 -0700
From:	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To:	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
Cc:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vhost: TX used buffer guest signal accumulation

On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 14:04 -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> It would be some change in virtio-net driver that may have improved
> the
> latency of small messages which in turn would have reduced the
> bandwidth
> as TCP could not accumulate and send large packets.

I will check out any latency improvement patch in virtio_net. If that's
the case, whether it is good to have some tunable parameter to benefit
both BW and latency workload?

Shirley 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/