linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] ftrace/MIPS: Enable C Version of recordmcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:28:49 +0100 (BST)
From:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc:	Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Reiser <jreiser@...wagon.com>,
	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ftrace/MIPS: Enable C Version of recordmcount

On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 18:59 +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > From: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
> > 
> > Selects HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT to use the C version of the recordmcount
> > intead of the old Perl Version of recordmcount.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
> 
> I'd like to get an Acked-by from Ralf and Maciej on this.

Acked-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...ux-mips.org>

 I have looked through it and spotted nothing obviously wrong, but I can't 
afford any further testing, especially at run time, sorry.

 One point to note -- it seems to me the code currently assumes a 32-bit 
model, i.e. the use of the -msym32 GCC option suitable for a 64-bit kernel 
loaded to a CKSEG0 address (cf. KBUILD_SYM32 in arch/mips/Makefile), tools 
support permitting.  That means it does not (correctly) support kernels 
loaded to an XPHYS address as required for some platforms (or otherwise 
chosen for testing such a configuration; modulo some processor errata and 
bootloader limitations, it is generally OK to run the kernel from XPHYS on 
64-bit chips even if the entire RAM fits into CKSEG0).

 For the avoidance of doubt -- I'm just mentioning it to emphasise a 
possible future direction for improvement of this code -- not an objection 
against this submission, that is certainly a good foundation for future 
development.

 Thanks to everybody involved.

  Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/