linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Make synchronize_srcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat,  6 Nov 2010 19:05:32 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() fast if running readers

The synchronize_srcu_expedited() function is currently quick if there
are no active readers, but will delay a full jiffy if there are any.
If these readers leave their SRCU read-side critical sections quickly,
this is way too long to wait.  So this commit first waits ten microseconds,
and only then falls back to jiffy-at-a-time waiting.

Reported-by: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/srcu.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/srcu.c b/kernel/srcu.c
index c71e075..a48caa7 100644
--- a/kernel/srcu.c
+++ b/kernel/srcu.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/srcu.h>
 
 static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *sp)
@@ -203,9 +204,14 @@ static void __synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, void (*sync_func)(void))
 	 * all srcu_read_lock() calls using the old counters have completed.
 	 * Their corresponding critical sections might well be still
 	 * executing, but the srcu_read_lock() primitives themselves
-	 * will have finished executing.
+	 * will have finished executing.  We initially give readers
+	 * an arbitrarily chosen 10 microseconds to get out of their
+	 * SRCU read-side critical sections, then loop waiting 1/HZ
+	 * seconds per iteration.
 	 */
 
+	if (srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, idx))
+		udelay(10);
 	while (srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, idx))
 		schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
 
-- 
1.7.0.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/