linux-kernel - Question/help re: themake scripts in 2.6.36

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 06 Nov 2010 21:51:51 -0700
From:	JD <jd1008@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Question/help re: themake scripts in 2.6.36

I have compiled 2.6.36 (i686) without any problems.
Since then, I have decided to change a couple of
config variables (using xconfig).
When done, running make all
causes the make scripts to stop compilation after building
a few objects, and spawn a shell.
Since I have no idea what to do in that shell, I exit
that shell, and the compilaton continues.
This takes place 3 times before compilation is complete.

Now, when I type make modules_install install,
only modules_install is done. /boot does not get
populated and /boot/grub/grub.conf is unchanged.

The currently installed and running 2.6.36-1
went through a similar scenario during build,
but at least install did work.
Now the install does not work.
Befor the present build attempt,
I had edited the Makefile to change the EXTRAVERSION to -2
in order not to clobber the installed  2.6.36-1

Could someone tell me what to do to force the install in /boot?
/lib/modules does have 2.6.36-2.fc13.i686 fully populated.

Thanx,

JD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/